Pages

Monday, February 28, 2011

Biography of Mikhail Gorbachev

Mikhail Gorbachev was born on March 2 1931 in Privolnoye, Stavropol territory in the North Caucasus, to a peasant house in a small village. His father was an agricultural mechanic on a public farm. In 1942 at the age of 11 his district was occupied by the Germans, important to 3 years of hardship while the Second World War. After spending time as an agricultural assistant in 1950 Mikhail Gorbachev enrolled as a law pupil in the University of Moscow. Here at university Mikhail Gorbachev became a full member of the Soviet Union Communist Party (Cpsu). Also at university Mikhail met and married his life partner Raisa

After receiving his degree in law in 1956 Mikhail made rapid expand within the Communist Party. By 1970 Mikhail had come to be the first Secretary for Stavropol territory, governing an area of 2.4 million people. By 1980 he had been made the youngest full member of the Politburo. After the death of Chernenko in 1985 M.Gorbachev was elected normal Secretary of the Communist Party a position of gigantic power.

News From Afghanistan

Perestroika and Glasnost

During his period in office M.Gorbachev introduced any policies which revolutionised the internal and external affairs of the Soviet Union. Firstly Perestroika "or restructuring" complicated opportunity up the Soviet economy to shop forces. By 1987 hidden rights of company was allowed for the first time since the 1920s. These reforms came partly out of the inefficiencies Gorbachev had seen in State controlled agricultural sectors. Due to the large scale inefficiencies within the Soviet economy the transformation to a shop economy has often been a painful one. However after any years of inflation and falling Gdp the Russian economy has started to stabilise and this course is generally viewed favourably by the Russians.

In internal affairs Gorbachev introduced the notion of Glasnost (openness) this was a confident break with the authoritarian past of the Soviet Union. Glasnost led to greater relaxation of speech, relaxation of worship and a discount in State operate over personel lives. Many 1000s of political prisoners were released while Gorbachev's period in government. Ironically this greater relaxation of speech was used to great supervene later by the many critics of Gorbachev within the Soviet Union.

End Of The Cold War

In the 1980s the Soviet economy was struggling due to the inefficiencies of a planned economy but also the huge sums spent on the arms race. Gorbachev felt the Soviet Union could no longer afford to spend such great sums on troops spending and therefore sought a discount the arms. This led to nuclear missile discount treaties with America and effectively ended the Cold War which had dominated international relations since 1945. Western leaders such as R.Reagan, G.Bush and M.Thatcher spoke warmly of their impressions of this "new style" Russian leader. In 1989 the Soviet Army also retreated from Afghanistan, this had proved a contentious and high-priced war for the Soviets.

Abandonment of the Brezhnev Doctrine.

In 1988 Gorbachev announced that the Soviet Union would no longer supervene the Brezhnev doctrine. The Brezhnev philosophy was formulated in 1968 and was used as a justification to vocalize Communist operate over the Warsaw Pact countries. (This was used while the troops termination of the Prague Spring in 1969.) Effectively Gorbachev gave Eastern European countries the right to pursue their own political agenda. This more than any other course had a remarkably quick and requisite effect, drastically changing the European political map. Beginning with Poland, the Eastern European countries experienced generally peaceful democratic revolutions, with Pro Soviet Communist parties being substituted by other democratic parties. Most symbolically in 1989 the Berlin Wall was torn down allowing East and West Germany to reunite. In recognition of Gorbachev's role in bringing an end to the cold war he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in October 1990.

Break up of Soviet Union

Despite praise from face the Soviet Union, Gorbachev had many enemies within the Soviet Union. On the one hand the "Conservatives" were alarmed at what they saw as the break up of the old Soviet Union. They wished to vocalize the troops and political power of the old Soviet Union. On the other hand "modernisers" led by Boris Yeltsin felt there was need for even quicker change in manufacture the transition to a shop economy. In 1991 Gorbachev was placed under house arrest by conservative critics, this was known as the August Coup. After 3 days Gorbachev was released, but on returning to Moscow his power had inexorably shifted away into the hands of Yeltsin. The Soviet Union and Politburo had come to be effectively defunct and Gorbachev resigned as President in 1991.

Post Presidency

Since 1991 Gorbachev has made abortive attempts to return to politics but has never been able to gain requisite beloved support. Since then he had devoted his concentration to projects such as the "Gorbachev Foundation" and the Green Cross International. The Green Cross international is an environmental organisation dedicated to attempting to solve key environmental problems.

Raisa, the wife of Gorbachev died of Leukaemia in 1999. They had one daughter Irina Gorbachev.

Biography of Mikhail Gorbachev

Thanks To : todays world news headlines

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Defense Base Act

With Us engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan being focal points for the news media, the use of contractors in improvement projects around the world has come more directly into the American consciousness. Although attentiveness to contractors only tends to arise when scandal breaks out, most contractors are legitimate workers who are trying to achieve leading goals under the payroll of the federal government. To protect those working in the employment of the government in American ports, the federal government passed the Defense Base Act, or Dba, in 1941.

As expected, Dba workers' compensation rules are significantly more stringent that quarterly state compensation laws. The process, unlike claims filing under state laws, begins with laborers notifying their superiors. It is general protocol that the allowable paperwork must be completed prior to medical treatment. The Office of Workers' compensation Programs handles these forms after they are appropriately filed.

News From Afghanistan

According to the law, the injured employee has the right to pick their physician of choice. The caveat to this is that the physician must be within the stylish list of physicians set by the Secretary of Labor. In accordance with this quantum of the law, employers must furnish these workers with the appropriate care until they recover. This may comprise the provision of medication and crutches as well as care from on-site nurses.

In general, scheduled injuries are permitted under the Dba's system, but are commonly not used in order to apply an average weekly wage principles of compensation. In this system, payment is calculated by totaling the worker's wage and dividing it according to weekly participation. There are provisions in which both parties agree to rule as opposed to the quarterly principles of payment, which allows for more communication between employees and employers.

To learn more about how contractors can protect themselves in case of an injury, contact a skilled and experienced workers' compensation attorney. 

Defense Base Act

See Also : todays world news headlines

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Tusk is Boycotting the opportunity Ceremony of the Beijing Olympic Games

Donald Tusk, the Prime priest of Poland has decided to boycott the opportunity ceremony of the Beijing Olympic games in an act of protest against Chinese actions in Tibet. This is a fact that few habitancy through out the world are aware of and possibly even fewer certainly care about for at the end of the day neither us nor Tusk should delude ourselves in to believing that Tusk's absence from the opportunity ceremony of the Olympic games is going to make any divergence what so ever to anybody. Let alone to the habitancy of Tibet in whose name Donald Tusk is supposedly doing it for. If we may be realistic the Chinese government which granted has an appalling human ownership narrative not only with regards to Tibetans but all its citizens will not change anything simply because one someone fails to turn up at a ceremony even a big one.

If we go back to the year of 1980 when the Olympic Games were due to take place in Moscow, it was Jimmy Carter; then president of United States who took the monumental option of not sending our American Olympic team to compete in the Moscow games in protest of Soviet intervention in Afghanistan. Carter's actions simply achieved the goal of hurting those American athletes who had trained so hard for that moment of glory in their lives but apart from this what else did his efforts estimate to? Well let us think for a minute. The Olympic Games were not shown on American television not that I myself missed them given that I spent this summer in Madrid where I witnessed how not even the Uk; our closest ally in any war did not succeed in our footsteps of boycotting the Moscow games in the naïve hope that it would make the Soviets withdraw their troops from Afghanistan. simply if even the Uk would not go along with us on this one, it is needless to say that neither would some of our less American influenced allies such as France, Spain, or Italy who like the Uk did not fail to make their proximity felt at the Moscow games.

News From Afghanistan

Carter's drive to get the nations of the world to join us in our boycott obviously failed miserably as did his bid to be reelected President when in November of the same year he would go on to suffer a landslide defeat at the hands of ex-actor, Ronald Wilson Reagan. Carter any way had other "brilliant ideas" on how to aid the habitancy of Afghanistan and one of them being a grain embargo of the Soviet Union. This tactic contrary to the first one had stronger effects. One of them being hurting our farmers while not helping the habitancy of Afghanistan in the slightest. possibly it was ideas like this one that earned him his Nobel Prize?

It is with this in mind that I ask not only Tusk but those who may be contemplating similar actions the following question. If a boycott of the Moscow games by the United States Olympic team, which is one of the biggest with possibly the one most fans to succeed it along with American networks also selecting not to broadcast the event (which meant mammoth lose of earnings to organizers of the games) failed to make the slightest divergence in Moscow's decision to withdraw their troops from Afghanistan why then would Donald Tusk's absence from the opportunity ceremony even be noticed by anyone exterior of Poland let alone change anything with regards to relationships in the middle of Beijing and Tibet?

The straightforward riposte is it will not change anything apart from possibly making Tusk feel good about himself for having made a gallant though futile endeavor at something that was doomed to failure from the get go. The Olympic games for good or worse are going to be held in China weather we like it or not; this is a fact and they will not be canceled and even if the whole Polish Olympic team along with other nations were to boycott them as was the case with the Los Angeles games of 1984 it will not alter Beijing's attitude toward Tibet or anything else for that matter. China right now has an cheaper that is certainly growing by leaps and bounds to the point that it has already past Italy and will soon do likewise with France if it has not done so already with regards to the size of their G.D.P. And though the Olympic Games will furnish them with a boost to their economy, it will not be much in comparison to the size of what their cheaper presently is. With this in mind we should come to the closing that even if the Olympic games were not to take place in Beijing this year it would not make that much of divergence to the Chinese cheaper let alone to their political machine.

I am a Republican so it would not be my tendency to agree with a Democrat but I must say that Bill Clinton was not entirely wrong when he said the way to bring about change in China is not via isolation or boycotts or embargos but dialog and negotiation. It is these two any way that should never be mistaken for appeasement which clearly failed in Munich in 1938 as it did at the Yalta discussion in 1945. For my part I can claim if only Clinton and other American Presidents had held this same line of view toward Cuba as they did and still do toward China who knows what changes might have taken place there by now? As for China things are changing even with regards to politics though possibly not as fast as some would like them to but for sure gone are the days of the "cultural revolution" and its brutalities.

As for Donald Tusk; if his goal is certainly to aid the habitancy of Tibet and not just make jests that are due to end in failure as did his bid to come to be president of Poland in 2005 then it is to him that I propose attending the inauguration of the Olympic Games and claiming he is doing so on behalf of the habitancy of Tibet. It would be a gesture like this that would bring more of the world's attention to the plight of the habitancy of Tibet then a no-show which did not work to persuade the Soviets in 1980 as it will not secede to do likewise with the Chinese in 2008.

Tusk is Boycotting the opportunity Ceremony of the Beijing Olympic Games

Thanks To : todays world news headlines

Thursday, February 24, 2011

A Rush Limbaugh Conservative Who Thinks Joe Biden is Right on Afghanistan

I am a Rush Limbaugh conservative; I have been listening to him for over 15 years. I have read books from Rush, Ann Coulter, George Will, Newt Gingrich, Glenn Beck, and Fred Barnes. I have attended Tea Party rallies and voted for Sarah Palin rather than for John McCain. I am also a military history buff and a watcher of Cspan. In fact I recall watching general Petraeus deliver his "book" on counterinsurgency a few years ago. It seemed like a logical strategy for some situations, but frankly view it was a long shot for Iraq. However he implemented the strategy in that theater along with getting the 3 diverse populations to not only form a common government but to take over the military control of insurgents freeing the Us military to leave; well at least it's in process.

However, Afghanistan is different. First and prominent the Us and its military is fatigued by war. One of the tenants of counterinsurgency is weighty boots on the ground to as they said in Vietnam, "Win the hearts and souls of the people". Many population referred to the implementation of counterinsurgency in Iraq as "the surge". The Us currently has a relatively small army with many solders having already served many tours in combat. The military and communal are weary of funerals, amputations, and suicides of our heroes. A flourishing counterinsurgency would take years and countless lives. Second, Afghanistan is not Iraq. The infrastructure and culture are much older and less modern. While they have important minerals they don't have the oil income like Iraq to fund their development. Third, the Taliban move from Afghanistan to Pakistan. What good would it do to invest in Afghanistan, they would just move to Pakistan? Fourth, President Obama has said we are pulling out starting in July of next year. The locals are wise to wait us out and not trust the soldiers. Remember the Khmer Rouge who killed millions following the Us departure from Vietnam? Fifth, the rules of engagement are so sensitive to civilian causalities that we will have increased causalities as well as reduced force morale. Sixth, for counterinsurgency to work you need a partner in government. Can we in fact trust Harmid Karzai to be that partner when it appears his own brother is a key figure in the opium fed underground?

News From Afghanistan

So that's why I don't think counterinsurgency will work. Here's why I think counterterrorism will work. Our main objective is to fight terrorism, not nation building. If we cripple and kill the bad guys they will not be able to arm, train, and levy harm upon us or our friends. Counterterrorism counts on Predator strikes plus quick targeted extra military missions to 'kill the head of the snake'. This strategy also permits us to destroy the poppy fields without having to have the bad guys (our soldiers) on the ground following the strikes. Reality time--it would be much cheaper as we grow further and further in debt. This would give our military a break to recuperate, rearm, and retrain for the next possible conflict(s). Action in North Korea or Iran would be dissimilar especially considering their backers, namely the Chinese and Russians.

I am a big fan of general Petraeus and believe he will go down in history, along with George W. Bush, as heros who established a democracy in Iraq from the ashes of war. But let's not force him to prove his strategy in a theater where it makes no sense. And I don't for a moment believe Joe Biden came up with this strategy following thoughtful contemplation. I think he heard this in a briefing and saw it as a viable way to counter the opposition. Ultimately for heaven's sake let's make this decision based on logic, opportunity for success, and in the context of where we are, and not as if this is the only existing or possible war theater. I believe firmly that conservatives can rise above the petty politics of personalities and move to a position based on logic. For these reasons I suggest we adopt the strategy of counterterriorism and abandon counterinsurgency in Afghanistan. And don't worry, Joe will be Joe and do something slow-witted soon.....

A Rush Limbaugh Conservative Who Thinks Joe Biden is Right on Afghanistan

My Links : todays world news headlines

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

British soldiery Under Funded in Afghanistan

It was reported in the British press in March 2010 that British Soldiers in Afghanistan "would be alive" if they had the right equipment. The British Government had failed to increase the funding to the soldiery in real terms.

The relatives of the first female soldier Cpl Sarah Bryant who was killed in Afghanistan in 2008 believe that she and her colleagues would be alive today if the Labour Government had in case,granted her with the proper equipment and training.

News From Afghanistan

The verdict of the coroner was that they were killed unlawfully.

The coroner said that they did not have the proper equipment or training.

The Prime priest said on 10th March 2010 that the training and equipment was being improved but this is all too diminutive to late after all he has been the Chancellor of the Exchequer since 1997.

Cpl Sarah Bryant was killed in Helmand Province in Afghanistan on June 17th 2008. With her were killed Cpl Sean Reeve, L/Cpl Richard Larkin and Trooper Paul Stout when their Snatch Land Rover was hit by a roadside bomb. The Snatch Land Rover was not designed for Afghanistan. It had previously been deployed in Northern Ireland on tarmac roads, not sand in a desert. This vehicle has been complicated in at least 37 deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The inquest was told how British soldiers had repeatedly asked for Wmik Land Rovers which have much best off road ability where as the Snatch is designed for use on real roads.

When the British soldiers were informed that they would only have the Snatch Land Rover for their definite performance they greeted the news with some "disbelief" de facto soldiers had nick named these vehicles as "Mobile Coffins".

They were made to be used on regular roads as they could not drive off road.

They had used a metal detector to check a water policy for mines but sadly some 70 metres later the Snatch vehicle detonated a mine incommunicable in a shallow ditch. The blast was described as huge. All four died roughly instantly.

If they had been driving a Wmik Landrover they would very probably have driven whether side of the water policy and therefore would have had a far greater possibility of surviving. A former infantry commander has called the Snatch Landrover a "death trap" and Dr Richard North a defence specialist had advised that it was "totally inadequate" for dealing with mines and bombs.

Major Sebastian Morley the Sas squadron commander in Helmand province resigned four months after this terrible incident and he accused the Labour government of being "Cavalier at best Criminal at worst " over equipping troops. He accused Whitehall officials of or continually ignoring warnings that habitancy would be killed if they prolonged to allow soldiery to be conveyable in Snatch Land Rovers.

At the inquest into their deaths evidence was heard that they were forced to use this vehicle because of vehicle shortages and that they lacked training in the use of metal detectors.Rather crucial I would have plan when you need to detect mines that are made of metal.

The Labour Government has said that the defence funds is rising but that is the very least that one would expect if you have two wars to fight one in Iraq and one in Afghanistan.

It seems that the Government failed to properly plan, act or equip the soldiery with the proper equipment

Therefore the deaths of these Soldiers must fall on their conscious. This is not a heritage that I would be proud of that is of soldiers being sent to war who are both poorly qualified and trained.

Only now, some two years after these soldiers death is the government arranging for new equipment to be delivered in the later half of 2010.

It is very sad that unlawful killing (the coroners' verdict) of British Soldiers is part of the Labour Legacy.

This is brought home to us every week as those lines of Black Hearses hike straight through Wooton Basset bringing back our dead heroes.

The Prime priest has now confirmed in the House of Commons that his evidence to the Chilcot inquiry was wrong in that the funding to the British Army had not increased every year in real terms as he had previously advised.

British soldiery Under Funded in Afghanistan

Related : todays world news headlines

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Is Graham Crackers?

Is Sen. Lindsey Graham (R) South Carolina crackers over the generals in Iraq? He seems to be going ga-ga over Gen. Petraeus, who does the bidding of King George. Bush that is. Graham has the unmitigated gall and temerity to attempt to interpret his lack of preserve for an amendment that would give our soldiery enough rest between deployments. The new quantum was proposed by his senate colleague Jim Webb (D) West Virginia. Graham's explanation for not supporting the Webb quantum is, he doesn't want to micro conduct the war. Webb's son happens to be deployed in Iraq. Maybe Sen. Graham detected a hint of self-interest in Sen. Webb's proposal. It is incorrect to call what is going on in Iraq a war.

It's an career with complications. Our soldiers are in the middle of fierce internecine fighting. Those who should know, refer to it as a civil war. Incorporate that with al-qaeda-in-Iraq, an unaffiliated branch of al-qaeda central, that is dedicated to creating havoc in Iraq and you have a snapshot of what is going on there. Some soldiers have been deployed in Iraq over four times, with hardly any rest between deployments. Ironically those who claim to preserve the soldiery most, like Sen. Graham, can't seem to take the extra step of insuring that they are properly equipped, suffiently paid and adequately rested between visits.

News From Afghanistan

As Forrest Gump would say, "Support is, as preserve does." Claiming to preserve the soldiery and assuredly supporting them are two distinctly separate things. President Bush, with whom Sen. Graham appears to be in lockstep, liberally heaps praise upon our troops, while concomitantly denying them the vital life salvage tool that they so desperately need. Soldiers are still forced to jury-rig their vehicles, which lacks life salvage armor plating. The lengths and frequency of their deployments indicates a level of disingenuousness on the President's part. Upon their return home, they have strangeness meeting the eligibility requirements for full healing coverage and care.

The Veteran's administration fights soldiers tooth and nail over classifications, which would allow them to get the healing and psychological attentiveness that they so desperately need. The preserve that Mr. Bush talks about would appear to be lacking where it counts most, aftercare. Sen. Graham mimics President Bush in request his senate colleagues to wait until normal David Petraeus reports on Iraq in September. He views any actions that the senate might take before that time to be premature, knowing full well, that not much will have changed by then. The problem with his position is that lives are at stake. Of course we're not talking about anybody that Sen. Graham needs to assuredly care about. After all no relatives of his have their lives on the line in Iraq.

Sen. Graham has whether bought into George Bush's big lie, "We're fighting them over there, so we don't have to fight them here," or he assuredly believes a soldiery victory can be achieved in Iraq. In whether case, he's deluded himself. In truth and in fact, we are fighting them over there because, over there is where the oil is. How else can one interpret diverting attentiveness from Afghanistan, where the enemies of America sought and received safe haven, to Iraq, where al-qaeda didn't exist before our arrival? There's nothing in Afghanistan worth co-opting that hasn't already been co-opted, along with their poppy fields. It doesn't appear that we are any more victorious in our efforts to fight drugs, than we've been in fighting terrorism. What we have done straight through the failed policies of George Dubya Bush and those who blindly preserve him, like Sen. Graham, who obviously must be crackers, is helped in the recruitment of a whole new crop of terrorists. Because of our incursion in Iraq, we have provided them with a more fertile training ground than they had in Afghanistan.

Our prolonged proximity in Iraq serves as a magnet for every jihadist wannabe and suicide bomber there is, yet Graham insists we remain mired in Iraq until September, to wait for Petraeus' report. I can envision the report's headline, "More Dead, More Wounded" and Some Progress" to show for it. The so-called surge is in full operation, with their customary goal being to derive Baghdad, yet the so-called Green Zone has been hit more times than a piñata. The hits have been devastating. Graham joins a long list of Presidential sycophants, like crazy Joe Lieberman, who thinks it might be constructive to set in motion a war with Iran, right about now. Neither Lieberman nor Graham have called for us to check Saudia Arabia, though eleven of the nineteen Nine-Eleven highjackers came from there. An breathtaking estimate of the jihadist and suicide bombers are Saudis.

Sen. Graham is nothing more than a hack politician, with the patina of respectability, pandering to his conservative base. The, we aren't the cut and run crowd. Sometimes the great part of valor is to fight and run away, so you can fight an additional one day. When informed that Iraqi Prime priest Maliki said Iraq can begin to stand up when the Americans leave his country, Sen. Graham said that wasn't what he assuredly meant. according to Graham, if we were to leave Iraq precipitously, chaos would result. The truth of the matter is, chaos exists there now. Whenever we leave Iraq, and at some point we must, chaos will result.

There is nothing we can do that will insure that is not the case. We destroyed Iraq's capability to defend their selves. It is unrealistic for us to expect them to be able to on our timetable. Their attitude seems to be, America created this mess and it's up to America to fix it. Despite Graham's worst fears, as long as we continue to remain in Iraq it will be at great peril. To not preserve some kind of sensible end to this quagmire, is to betray us and the soldiery in the worst way. For this fancy I propose in the strongest terms Graham must be crackers.

Is Graham Crackers?

Friends Link : todays world news headlines

Monday, February 21, 2011

A review of Online Storefront

Not too long ago I got an online storefront maker with shopping cart. I needed it to heighten my importing business. Last decade we were one of the prominent clubs dealing with imports from Afghanistan, but due to lack of modern technology we were put behind and lost shares in this industry. It took us some time to perceive what the speculate to lose all kinds of firm was. Our products were on display at our website, there were also prices, descriptions and all the details. There was also a phone amount where orders could be placed. We in fact didn't know what we were doing wrong. But the question turned out to be a simple one. There was one thing we didn't have but should have had.

We lacked online storefront with a shopping cart included. Our customers were not able to buy online and this was a mistake. Obviously, every person is so much into shopping online that we even lost some of our longtime clients for that. The online storefront was not very hard to set up and plug in. I am not much into computers but I had to cope the setup myself as we don't have a fully employed web designer. But it turned out to be quite easy and everything worked flawlessly. To be honest, I was very surprised how well the online storefront worked. But I think we have a small question there. The online storefront page differs greatly from the rest of the website.

News From Afghanistan

I know what in fact matters is that with it people can buy products online but still something has to be done. I don't want to take any more chances and after I survived the loss of business, I am thought about to do whatever it takes to make it all look good and professional. I am not sure what the best solution to the online storefront riddle is, but I guess hiring a new web designer would be a good idea. Most of the firm is run by my brother, my self and a few employees, so I am quite indecisive when it comes to occasion new positions. We have our own approach to firm and knowing how difficult it is to find people you can work with, it gets a bit complicated. However, no matter what, I have every estimation to fix the online storefront one way or the other.

A review of Online Storefront

Tags : todays world news headlines

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Body Language Books

My first body language book was "Body Language" by Julius Fast which I read when I was an undergraduate in the 1960's. While I have always been fascinated by nonverbal communication, my purpose in reading that book was based on the cover picture of a young women whose body language was being analyzed to resolve either she liked me or not. In other words, sex was selling then, and still sells now. But I also have been a pupil of angry faces and attitudes since I was a limited boy living in a house with two adult alcoholics.

I can remember coming home from school and sticking my head in the door, and being able to sense who was angry and how hazardous it was, and if it was too dangerous, I would head out to play and stay out for as long as I dared, so I got very good at reading very subtle cues about that emotion, and I learned to pay very close concentration to the faces of the habitancy nearby me, in order to make good an leave if need be.

News From Afghanistan

However I did not get very good at reading signals of attraction, which cost me some relationships as an adult. So we leap ahead a few decades and I find myself in field in which trust is a key part of what I do as is paying close concentration to very subtle nonverbal communication skills.

If you watch closely, you can see emotions play over the face of an personel and those emotions can be very helpful in guiding the therapeutic conversation. I think that the attachment work of Allen Schore,Ph.D., and the work of Paul Ekman,Ph.D. On facial expressons are particularly remarkable in this regard.

Ekman has studied facial expressions over cultures for at least 25 years, and has worked to make a catalog of human facial expressions.

I have used Ekman's work in my domestic violence and anger administration classes to indicate that an emotional response of hurt to an expression of contempt, for example, which Ekman says is a universal for human communication, not influenced by cultural considerations, can occur in 1/25th of a second, perhaps 2 and 1/2 times as fast as I can blink my eyes.

If I am not aware of that feeling of hurt, which is a vulnerable feeling, I can get remarkable by creating an angry thought, and changing my physiology to an adrenaline and cortisol based physiology which demands an action, an expression, in order to return the organism to a relaxed state.

If that performance is a violent action, lives can turn in a very short period of time, and we call those kinds of crimes names like road rage. Ekman's body language books are used by the Cia and Fbi to direct conversations, or resolve if man is lying. I am not sure if Professor Ekman agrees that definitive statements like truth and untruth can be derived from his work, but it is being used by agencies in the criminal justice system for that purpose.

I like to ask questions about the emotions I am seeing, because clients are not always aware of the subtle expressions of feelings Those subtle responses can guide us to the most troubling memory or view or fear, and once that view or feeling or memory is uncovered, we can begin to use any number of therapeutic tools to turn it.

In fact, up-to-date study and study discoveries about Ptsd and veterans coming back from Afghanistan and Iraq are helping to confirm that even the most traumatic memory can be modified, and a balance restored to the human experience. Body language books that shed some light on the process of communication and particularly how fast it happens are very beneficial parts of the counseling experience.

I know my Basic Counseling Skills class spoke to reflective listening and paraphrasing and mirroring which involve body language skills and attention. Allen Schore's work on attachment takes us all the way back to a newborn's efforts to describe and the call and sass kind of communication that happens in the middle of care taking parents and the child.

Just like adult interactions though, those patterns are not perfectly attuned and need frequent adjustments of communication by both parties. Most body language books do not speak to the speed of body language and body language interpretation, which is a key aspect of effective communication.

Not sure if you are fast adequate to consideration those 1/25th second expressions? Well, I think the good news is that most of us in most communications do quite well at sustaining the cultural norms and facilitating human interactions. For example, I am particularly fascinated by adult males and how we negotiate doors and hall ways when we are on task, or in a hurry.

Men will express "excuse me's" for example, and hold the door or move to the side politely, but the anticipation is that the other party will move quickly by, so both can continue with their schedule. If you listen to the verbal messages, there is often a mismatch, yet the nonverbal behavior gets the goals of the participants accomplished without violence.

If you are beyond doubt concerned in watching body language happening, you can train your concentration and memory using the dual n back tool, which is a brain training program that will increase your Iq and your quality to read body language books.

Body Language Books

Friends Link : todays world news headlines

Saturday, February 19, 2011

True History of Pakistan

Introduction

Pakistan lies in the North Western part of South Asia. It is bordered by China in the North, Afghanistan in the North-West, Iran in South-West, Arabian Sea and Indian Sea in the South and India in the East. Pakistan, as evident, is placed at the crossroads of South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East making it an easy linking point between Central Asia and South Asia.

News From Afghanistan

There have been vital immigration movements, in the areas now constituting Pakistan since pre-historic times. The citizen of Pakistan are descendants of dissimilar racial groups and sub-racial stocks, who entered the subcontinent over the past 5000 years, mainly from central and western Asia from time to time. Yet unlike the favorite misconception, it all the time maintained its identity and individuality cut off from its neighbor India who claimed that Pakistan was a part of Aakhand Bharat (Undivided India) on the basis of history. Hence its partition from India is totally unjustified. But thousands of years of history of the sub-continent tells a dissimilar story. It tells us that the areas called Pakistan today had consistently remained as a single, compact and a cut off geographical and political entity since ancient times.

Few citizen would be aware of the true history of Pakistan still; few would know that the oldest stone tool in the world, dating back to 2.2 million years was found at Rabat, about fifteen miles away from Rawalpindi and the largest hand Axe was found in the Soan Valley. And to top it all, the site of the first placed life in the world dating back to the 8th millennium Bc has been found at Mehergarh in the Sibi districts of Balochistan. Although Pakistan, as an independent country dates only from August 14th, 1947 and the nation itself can trace its beginnings only to a few centuries ago, yet the territories of Pakistan are heir to one of the richest and the oldest civilizations and settlements of the world.

Indus Valley Civilization

The Indus Valley Civilization or the Harappan Civilization[i] is one of the most entertaining and the oldest civilizations ever known. It flourished between 3000 and 1500 Bc by the banks of River Indus or Sind in Pakistan. This civilization existed along the Indus River in present day Pakistan with its main centers at Mohenjodaro in Sind, Harappa in the Punjab, Kej in the Baluch territory and Judeiro Daro in the Pathan region. It is ordinarily believed that the inhabitants of Indus Valley Civilization were Dravidians who came to sub-continent from eastern Mediterranean.

This civilization reached its climax colse to the two metropolitan centers of Mohenjodaro and Harappa. These cities are well known for their impressive, organized and regular layout. They were the centers of arts and crafts. Agreeing to John Marshal, the Harappan citizen were literate and used the Dravidian language [ii] which is one of the world's first known languages. Their chief career was agriculture and trade. The civilization is famous for its strong central government, sense for art and architecture and house planning.

Flood is determined to be the destroyer of this culture due to which agriculture got disrupted and trade routes affected which led majority of the citizen to migrate to other fertile lands. Those who were left behind fell victim to the Aryan invasion. The civilization lasted for fifteen hundred years.

Arrival of the Aryans

In about 1700 Bc, Indus Valley citizen saw the advent of new horse-riding nomads from Central Asia leading to the eventual decline of their victorious and sophisticated Indus Civilization. The Aryans came in at least two major waves in Pakistan. The first wave came colse to 2000 Bc and the second wave came at least six centuries later. It was after the second wave of Aryans invasion that they became dominant and their language spread over the entire distance and breadth of the region. They entered straight through the Swat Valley from the northwest mountain passes and pushed the local citizen or the Dravidians (the citizen of Indus Civilization) southwards or towards the jungles and mountains in north. They placed first in Punjab and Indus Valley and then spread eastward and southward. Unlike Indus citizen Aryans were uncivilized race. Their religious texts and human remains recommend that the Aryans were violent in their invasions. They killed the inhabitants and burnt their cities. A similar view was opined by Stuart Piggot in his book Pre-historic India:

"The Aryan advent was in fact the advent of barbarians into a region already extremely organized into an empire based on a long established tradition of literate urban culture".

Besides being sturdy fighters Aryans were also skilled farmers and craftsmen. They were the worshippers of nature and their religious books were called Vedas. Aryans were tall, well-built and; had entertaining features and fair complexion while the inhabitants of Indus Valley were black, flat nosed and of short stature. The Indus citizen submitted to the excellent Aryans and became their slaves. This fact later became the basis of Caste law in order of superiority such as Brahmans (priest) Kashatryas (warriors) and Vaisyas (business society and commoners). The Dravidians were placed in fourth and termed as Sudras (slaves).

Persian Empire

In the 6th century Bc, Darius invaded Pakistan and made the Indus plain and Gandhara part of his Persian Empire of the Achaemenid, with his capital at Persepolis in Iran. It was from then onwards that the city of Taxila began to grow and the region saw the rise of an additional one great civilization called the Gandhara Civilization outside most of the northern Pakistan with capitals at both Pushkalavati (Charsadda) and Takshka-sila (Taxila).

As part of the Persian Empire, the region once again rose to zenith. Trade with Iran and the west resumed once again, economy flourished, weapons and other objects of daily use were produced. Charsadda and Taxila became the centers of activity. One of the greatest universities of the ancient world was founded at Taxila. It was at this university that Chandra Gupta Maurya got his education, who later founded the Maurya Empire in South Asia. This victorious Achaemenian Empire that extended from Pakistan to Greece and Egypt, however, collapsed under the onslaught of Alexander of Macedonia.

Alexander's Invasion

Alexander entered Pakistan from the northern route at Swat and conquered the Gandharan region between 327 and 325 Bc. He reached Taxila first. The Raja of Taxila knowing Alexander's vast army's reputation gave him a welcome instead of resistance. Alexander stayed at Taxila for sometime then came over Raja Porus who was the ruler of the territories east of Jehlum. He then went up to River Beas from where his army refused to go further, so he then came down straight through the entire distance of Pakistan, crossed the Hub River near Karachi and departed for home dying on the way. Alexander's invasion brought Greek knowledge and science to Taxila.

Up till here it is famous that while each settlements and invasions may that be of the Indus Valley Civilization, Aryans or while the half a millennium period after Aryan's migrations and while the Persian Empire, Pakistan all the time stood as a cut off entity from India and the period covered by these settlements is about 2200 years.

Mauryan Empire

Alexander's untimely demise at Babylon in 323 B.C resulted in the breakup of his vast empire in to two parts (The Byzantine Empire and Bacterian Greeks). The operate of this region therefore fell into the hands of native dynasties and tribes. Chandragupta Maurya was the founder of Maurya Empire who marched into the Gangetic plains, defeated the Nanda Kings and established a strong government at a place called Magadha (present Bihar). However, it should be noted that he ruled from India but he was a son of Potohar region and a Prince of Taxila. He followed Jainism. His grandson Ashoka was a Buddhist.

As the Mauryan rulers did not took into Hinduism and promoted whether Jainism or Buddhism, they became field to Hindu's criticism. Hindu's straight through their scheming and conspiracy managed to put an end to Mauryan Dynasty and instead gave birth to Brahman origin dynasty of Singhas followed by Kanvas and Indras. These dynasties ruled southern and central India but proved to be weak and short lived.

Graeco-Bactrian Rule

The Bactrian Greeks arrived in Gandhara in 185 Bc, about 50 years after the death of Ashoka. They were the decedents of Alexander the Great's armies from Bactria (now Balkh, in northern Afghanistan). They built Greek cities at Taxila and Pushkalavati (Charsadda) and introduced their language, art and religion in the country of Gandhara. Their language lasted more than 500 years and their art and religion had vital influence on the Gandhara Civilization. The most considerable of the Bactrian Greek ruler was Menander (mid-second century Bc). The Graeco-Bactrian rule lasted for only a century.

The Sakas

After the Graeco-Bactrian, Pakistan was divided into any small Greek Kingdoms who fell prey to the great wave of Scythians (Sakas) who migrated on an uncut scale. They were the nomads of North Iran. Sakas overthrew the Greek rulers and established their operate all over Pakistan. The Sakas settlements were so vast that Pakistan came to be known as Scythia. Gandhara became the center of the Saka domains, and Taxila was chosen the capital. The Sakas or Scythians were tall, large framed and fierce warriors. They were breathtaking horsemen and expert in lance. Sakas were followed by the considerable Parthians from east of the Caspian Sea, in about 20 Ad.

The Kushans

The Kushans from Central Asia established the Kushan Empire in Indus Valley. The third king of this dynasty Kanishka was the most victorious ruler. His reforms earned him fame. Like his predecessors he also took active interest in Buddhism. Kushans made Peshawar their capital. The Kushans period is determined the golden age of Pakistan and brought great wealth and prosperity to the region with the development of the Silk Route to China. It came to be known as Kushana-shahar, the land of the Kushans. It was the Kushan kings who gifted the national dress of shalwar(shirt), kamiz(trousers) and sherwani to Pakistan.

After Kanishka's death, his successors failed to keep the Empire intact. The succeed of which was that some of its parts were captured by Sassanians of Persia. In the 4th century a new dynasty of Kidar (little) Kushans came to power and established their capital at Peshawar. At more or less the same time Gupta Empire came in to power in the neighboring country of India and annexed a vast area of the sub-continent yet it did not went beyond Sutlej and did not included Kashmir. So while the Gupta period, Pakistan was in the hands of Kushans and Sassanians.

White Huns

The Huns were the nomad tribe of China's western borderland who after conquering Central Asia and Iran invaded Pakistan from Central Mongolia. Their chiefs were called 'Khans'. The single field of the Huns, which came to Pakistan, is known as Epthalite or White Huns. One of their considerable rulers was Mehar Gul whose capital was Sakala (present Sialkot). They killed Buddhists and burned all the monasteries. Their conquest wholly eliminated the Gupta regime. The origin of majority of the Afghan-Pathan tribes and Rajput and Jat clans of Punjab and Sind, Agreeing to modern scholars, are descendents from White Huns. The fall of the Hun rulers resulted in emergence of petty kingdoms which caused deterioration in political, group and economic condition until Muslims came in the scene.

Arab Invasion

During the Rajput's period in north India i.e., 7th to 12th century Ad the light of Islam penetrated into this part of the world. Islam arrived in Pakistan from two directions, south and north. In 711 an Arab expedition under a 20 year old Syrian Muhammad Bin Qasim arrived by sea to suppress piracy on Arab shipping and established operate of the sub-continent as far as north of Multan and built up a kingdom of Al-Mansurah in Sind. Mohammad bin Qasim conquered Sind and ruled it for about three years before being recalled and killed. After Mohammad Bin Qasim's departure, Muslim rule got confined to Sind and southern Punjab only. However, from this period onward Pakistan was divided into two parts for a long time; the northern one comprising of the Punjab and Nwfp and the southern one comprising of Multan, Sind and Balochistan under discrete Muslim rulers.

The Turks

In 10th century Ad, Turkish descendents having their capital at Ghazni attacked this region. They migrated from central Asia and played a leading part in the political life of the sub-continent for about 200 years. The Ghaznavids, a Turkish dynasty which rose in Afghanistan, succeeded the Arabs and under the leadership of Sultan Mahmud Ghaznavi, established Muslim rule in the sub-continent. Sultan Mahmud of Ghaznah or Mahmud Ghaznavi, son of Turkish King of Ghazni namely Sabuktgin invaded Pakistan from the north. Gandhara, the Punjab, Sind and Balochistan all became part of the Ghaznavid Empire, which had its capital at Ghazni, in Afghanistan and later at Lahore.

With the advent of Muslims Turks also came the Sufis and dervishes from Central Asia, Iran and Afghanistan who straight through their teaching spread the message of Islam all over the country. Some of them are Sheik Ismael, Syed Ali Hajveri, Ganj Shakar, Moeen-ud-Ajmeeri, Nizam-ud-Din Oliya, Baha-ud-din Zakiria and Khawaja Moeen-ud-din Chishti. It was due to these pious saints and Sufis that Islam spread to the entire distance of the sub-continent. The city of Multan became famous as the city of Saints. Though Ghaznavid rule in Pakistan lasted for over 175 years but Mahmud did not annexed any area beyond Ravi. He contented himself with the annexations of the Punjab only. He was neither a robber nor tyrant as written by some historians. His reputation as a great patron of culture and literature has remained undiminished to this date. It was under his patronage that the well known epic Shahnama was written by Firdawsi.

The Ghaznavid Kingdom came into disagreement with the rulers of Ghor who destroyed the city of Ghazna reducing it to ashes. Ghors were Oghuz Turks of Ghor in Afghanistan. Sultan Muhammad of Ghor and his slave lieutenant Qutb-ud-din Aybak raided sub-continent and captured Delhi in 1193. Ghori was a brave soldier and able administrator but not as fantastic as Mahmud Ghaznavi. However, Ghori left a lasting impact on the history of India. He is reputed to be a mild and benovelant man and a just ruler. He had not any heirs. He trained his slaves in warfare and administration. It was Aybak, one of his slaves who became his successor after Ghori's assassination in 1206.

After the death of Ghori, his slave Qutab-ud-Din Aybak established the first Turkish Slave Dynasty (1206-90), which lasted for over 300 years. Aybak was the most trusted general of Muhammad Ghori and was given the executive operate of some of the conquered lands. He initially made Lahore as the capital but later moved to Delhi thatswhy the slave dynasty is also referred as the Sultanate of Delhi. However Aybak's reign was short lived (5 years) and he was succeeded by nine other slave kings. Among his successors, his son-in-law, Iltutmish (1211-36), Raziyya Sultana (1236-1239) and Balban were the most famous. Balban is remembered for his strong centralized government. With his death, the dynasty declined and the final blow came in a form of a Jalaluddin Firuz Khilji. The Sultanate period brought the greater part of the sub-continent under its operate and established Muslim Rule on firm grounds.

The Sultanate period also saw the rise and fall of 4 other dynasties in rapid succession: the Khiljis (1290-1320), the Tughlaqs (1320-1413), the Sayyids (1414-51), and the Lodhis (1451-1526). The Khiljis were Turks by origin but had resided in Afghanistan so long that they were no longer regarded as Turks. They took operate of the sub-continent in a form of a coup. Among them the Alao-Din-Khilji, was the most famous as he had a great impact on the history of India. He was efficient, imaginative and strong ruler. The Khilji Empire lasted for 30 years. The Khiljis were succeeded by the Tughluqs who consolidated the Muslim rule and revived the empire. The Tughluqs restored the group works of utility such as forts and canals and reestablished law and order. The Sayyids and the Lodhis followed next and their rule remained till 1526 when Babur founded the Mughal Empire.

The Mughals

'Mughal' is the Persian translation of the word 'Mongol' from which we get the English word 'mogul' meaning 'tycoon'. The Moguls were the last of the Mongols. In the 16th century, Zaheeruddin Mohamed Babur, the first Mughal Emperor and a descendent of Tamerlane and Genghis Khan, raided the Punjab from Afghanistan and defeated Ibrahim Lodhi, at the historic battle of Panipat and founded the Mughul Empire. Babur was succeeded by his son, Humayun in 1530. Humayun was ousted by the Sher Shah Suri, who ruled the empire until his death in 1545. Humayun who went into self exile in Persia returned and regained the throne in 1554 but died two years later. He was succeeded by his son Akbar. Akbar was the greatest of the Mughal Emperors and ruled the longest period. He improved the centralized executive law and was a great patron of art and literature. Mughal art and architecture reached its height under Akbar's son Jahingir reign, and later under his grandson Shah Jahan. They left a heritage of magnificent mosques, palaces, tombs, forts and gardens which can still be seen in Lahore, Multan, Jehlum and other places. Auranzeb succeeded Shah Jahan and who ruled from 1658 to 1707. He was a pious man and an efficient administrator. With the death of Auranzeb, the great Mughal Empire (1526-1857) disintegrated.

In 1739, Nadir Shah of Persia invaded the region and after his death Ahmed Shah Abdali founded the kingdom of Afghanistan in 1747. Then in the early 19th century, the Sikhs pushed the Afghans back to the Khyber Pass. Ranjit Singh, the famous Sikh leader made Lahore his capital and ruled from 1799 to 1839. The Sikh rule collapsed under the British and thus ended the Muslim rule in the subcontinent. However it should be noted that unlike Britishers "Muslim rule in India was established by immigrant elite. The Muslims didn't rule India from a distant homeland, nor were they members of a dominant group within the Indian group community".

The British Period

The British arrived as merchants with the British East India enterprise at the beginning of the 17th century and gradually became complex in Indian politics and finally, after the battle of Plassey in 1757, began to conquer the sub-continent. By 1843, Sind was wholly in their control. They defeated the Sikhs in 1845 and 1849 in Anglo-Sikh War.

After the First War of Independence in 1857 (also known as the Sepoy Mutiny), the British Government took direct operate of Pakistan. This marked the beginning of the British Raj (British Rule), and in the name of Queen Victoria the British prolonged to advance their empire. Hunza on the Chinese border was the last area to fall into British hands, in 1891; only Afghanistan and some western most areas of Pakistan prolonged to remain outside their control. They demarcated the Durand Line in 1893 to cut off Pakistan from Afghanistan. The British had a strong influence on modern Pakistan. They not only introduced their executive and legal systems, but also brought with them their culture, language, art and architecture, some of which can still be seen in Pakistan today.

The Struggle for Pakistan

After the unsuccessful First War of Independence in 1857, the British determined to suppress and weaken the Muslims, whom they held mainly responsible for the uprising. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan (1817-98) made one of the first attempts to restore Muslim status by founding the Aligarh Movement. Muslims formed a political party with the name of Muslim League under the chairmanship of Nawab Salimullah Khan in 1906 at Dhaka. Yet it was only when Jinnah assumed the leadership of Muslim League in 1936 that it became a dynamic, national society of the Muslims.

In 1930, a Muslim poet and a philosopher Dr. Muhammad Iqbal proposed the creation of a cut off Muslim state for those areas of the subcontinent with a Muslim majority. His proposal was adopted by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, a British trained lawyer and Pakistan's first head of state. This idea of a cut off Muslim state in the sub-continent to be called Pakistan took the form of a resolution adopted by the Muslim League in 1940 at its Lahore session. This was the Lahore resolution that came to be popularly known as Pakistan Resolution. The philosophy on which it was based is called Two Nation Theory, which emphasized on the individuality of Hindus and Muslims stating that these two nations have their own civilization, culture, historical heritage and religion due to which they can not live under a single country. This in case,granted the basis for Pakistan.

The British realized that they would have to relinquish their hold upon the sub-continent so on 20th February 1947; the British Prime minister Mr. Lord Atlee announced that the British Government would hand over the power of the sub-continent to its natives. It was finally agreed that the sub continent should be partitioned and the power will be handed over to the two states at Independence on the mid-night of 14th and 15th August 1947. Thus the Muslims struggle under the dynamic leadership of Muhammad Ali Jinnah bore fruit; the sub-continent won Independence from English and Pakistan was created as a sovereign and independent Muslim state on 14th August 1947.

It was decided that Pakistan would comprise the eastern (present Bangladesh) and western (present Pakistan) wings of the country. The Muslims living in Indian region had to migrate to Pakistan. This migration was accompanied by terrible violence and bloodshed not to mention discrete problems of agency Pakistan had to face in the hands of uncooperative Indians.

Independent Pakistan

The world has all the time known two dissimilar countries and cultures in the sub-continent; one based on the Sindhu or Indus (Pakistan) and the other on the Ganges Valley (India) known as Bharatvarta. The Sindhu country with its Harappan Civilization had its operate from Rupar on upper Sutlej to the lower reaches of the Indus on the Arabian Sea, the territory now covered by Pakistan. The Sindhu Land was all the time famous for its independent existence, wholly detached from Gangetic Valley or India.

Moreover, Pakistan as an independent country all the time looked westward and had more cultural, market and political connections with the Sumerian, Babylonian, Persian, Greek and Turks than with the Gangetic Valley. while the 5000 years of Pakistan's known history, Pakistan remained part of India for a total period of 711 years of which 512 years were covered by the Muslims period and 100 years each by the Mauryan (mostly Buddhist) and British periods. Pakistan had remained whether independent or part of powers at west and its attachment to India was only an exception.

This may be the surmise that there is barely any Hindu architectural influence in Pakistan and instead of Hinduism; Islam shapes the lives of most Pakistanis. Moreover, Hindus themselves have all the time regarded Yavanas (the inhabitants of Pakistan) in those days as impure and outside the limits of Aryandom. So Pakistan as a part of India is a weak law having no historical grounding. It was honestly the famous Two Nation law formulated by Iqbal and realized by Jinnah that led to the creation of Pakistan in 1947.

Notes:

[i] Called 'Indus Valley' by John Marshall, Mohenjodaro and the Indus Valley Civilization pp.i-iii (London, 1931), and 'Harappan' by Stuart Piggott, Prehistoric India (London: Pelican Books, 1950), p. 132.
[ii] Quoted in ancient Cities of the Indus, Gregory L. Possehl (ed), Carolina scholastic Press, New Delhi, 1979, pp. 105-107.

References:

1. Dani A H. Pakistan: History straight through the centuries. [Online] [Cited 2009 April 2] ready from: heritage.gov.pk/html_Pages/history1.html
2. Shaw I. Pakistan Handbook. The guide book enterprise Ltd. Hong Kong. 1989.
3. Abdulla A. The historical background of Pakistan & its people. Tanzeem Publishers. Karachi. 1973.
4. Possehl G L (ed). ancient cities of the Indus. Carolina scholastic Press. New Delhi. 1979.
5. Rahman T. Peoples & languages in pre-Islamic Indus Valley. [Online] [Cited 2009 April 2]. ready from:
inic.utexas.edu/asnic/subject/peoplesandlanguages.html
6. Haroon A. Muhammad Bin Qasim to general Pervaiz Musharraf: Triumphs, tribulations, scars of 1971 tragedy & current challenges. Krl Post Office Box 502. Rawalpindi. 2000.
7. Piggot S. Pre Historic India. Penguin Books. 1950.
8. Akhtar R (ed). Pakistan Year Book 1974. East & West Publishing Company. Karachi.
9. Elliot H M & Dowson J. The History of India as told by its own historians: The Muhammadan Period. Vol. 1. Trubner & Co. London. 1867-1877.
10. P.M Holt, Ann K.S, Lambton & Lewis B(eds). The Cambridge History of Islam: The further Islamic Lands, Islamic society & Civilization. Cambridge University Press. 1970.
11. Hardy P. The Muslims of British India. Cambridge University Press. London. 1972.

True History of Pakistan

Tags : todays world news headlines

Friday, February 18, 2011

Honor and Country

Is there still a war in Iraq and Afghanistan? Unless we have family or friends serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, most of us are carrying on with our lives as if all is normal. We continue to shop, go to work, and supervene our popular sports teams.

Meanwhile, over in Afghanistan and Iraq, American soldiers are suffering from depression and committing suicide.

News From Afghanistan

Military statistics claim 16 soldiers died in Afghanistan and Iraq in January 2009. What's most disturbing is the suicide rate for troops personnel in the same month. There were at least 24 confirmed suicides, according to Pentagon statistics released earlier this year.

Military personnel are alarmed that more soldiers died from their own hands than from enemy gunfire.

In 2008, the Army confirmed at least 128 soldiers committed suicide with an further 15 suspected of committing suicide.

In an effort to preclude suicide and depression, the troops has added training that will teach its leaders to be more active in recognizing suicidal tendencies and depression.

Unfortunately, this training will only serve troops during their troops stints. What happens after these troops are discharged? Will they receive lifetime counseling and therapy for handling depression and the loss of their comrades? Will counseling be ready for the soldiers who come home to find out their wives have been playing house with other men?

From personal experience, I can recite to the hardships facing a discharged war veteran. My father is a Vietnam combat veteran. He was drafted and sent to Southeast Asia for unknown reasons. Since advent back home from Vietnam, his life has never been the same.

For him, arriving home was worse than dealing with any VietCong snipers. He didn't get the same hero rehabilitation my grandfather received after serving in World War Ii. My father never received whatever after surviving his combat tour. Instead of a parade or a few free drinks, fellow Americans spit in his face and called him a baby killer.

To this day he has put Vietnam behind him, but he has never forgotten how he was treated by other Americans.

He is no longer a carefree college learner from the 60s. He is a previous killer who still can't justify why he was made to take the life of a yellow skinned stranger in the name of honor and country.

For veterans advent home from Afghanistan and Iraq, they may sense similar hardships as my father and other combat veterans. Many returning veterans will be bitter while others arrive home missing the arms and legs they had at birth.

Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan will learn that the real war starts after they get home as they try to adapt back into a life they used to live.

Honor and Country

Recommend : todays world news headlines

Thursday, February 17, 2011

The Plight of Women in Afghanistan

Women in Afghanistan continue to have lives that--in the words of 17th century philosopher Thomas Hobbes--are "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short." With the possible exception of Sub-Sahara Africa, Afghanistan is maybe the worst place in the world for females of all ages. The reasons for this desperate state of affairs vary, but invariably they consist of poverty, illiteracy, lack of condition care and the pernicious succeed of religious fundamentalism.

Afghanistan is desperately poor. In 2009 the per capita wage was under 0 per year--too low to appear on international statistical charts. This shape compares with ,990 in China, ,450 in Poland, and ,500 in the United States. The per capita wage is unlikely to growth appreciably in the next 50 years because the country does not have a viable tax base or the infrastructure that is needed to keep economic development.

News From Afghanistan

The whole of illiteracy in Afghanistan is startling. According to researchers with the United Nations, an estimated 50 per cent of Afghan men cannot read or write. The illiteracy rate for women is even higher--estimated at 79 per cent. In areas of the country ruled by the Taliban, girls are forbidden to go to school. The only education for boys involves rote memorization of religious tracts.

Women do not receive any meaningful condition care in Afghanistan. One measure of this lack of care is the country's maternal mortality rate of 1,600 per 100,000 women. This compares with 7 per 100,000 in the United Kingdom and the United States. Afghan women must seek permission from husbands, fathers or brothers to see a doctor. If the men refuse, the women's healing needs remain unmet. In the rare cases when Afghan women are allowed to go to a clinic or hospital, they may be seen by female clinic workers only.

Religious fundamentalism has its roots in poverty and illiteracy, but also in the fear and suspicion that are part of the everyday lives of Afghan people. Women have no rights, and they may be beaten with impunity by "religious police" if the women are not in the business of a husband or male relative; also, religious police may beat Afghan women if they think the women are not dressed properly. Uniformed police, if present, never interfere.

The United States is presently spending billion monthly in Iraq and Afghanistan, but none of this money makes its way down to the impoverished women. The money is instead spent on a puppet army, a puppet police force, and a puppet government. Also, an estimated 40 percent of U. S. Taxpayer money sent to Afghanistan is skimmed off by corrupt politicians and varied warlords.

Afghan women have no hope, no future.

The Plight of Women in Afghanistan

See Also : todays world news headlines

Monday, February 14, 2011

Iran and the West

The policy of the west towards many Muslim countries is strange, especially that of the Us is strangest of all since long. Since long World has been listening and overtly watching the row between Iran, Israel and America.

History of the friction between Us, Israel and Iran is not new. Since the Khomeini revolution of Iran of 1979 these states are at daggers drawn. The age old animosity of these states is still hot, fresh and unresolved. No country is showing any forbearance as far as words are concerned. On each next day we hear some newer issue between America and Iran or Iran and Israel.

News From Afghanistan

There were few skirmishes and that too in media profiles in the starting between these' warring nations'. The Usa and Israel and Iran might have reservations but have done no harm to except empty threats. World felt many a time that the America is going to assault Iran, but these were only misconceptions. A few incidents can be quoted as the clash between the states but afterward these appeared just bluffing. The base people or layman has been being continuously made fool since then. What is the aim and object of this war of the words? The only thing that comes in the mind is the strategy!

The portended opposition of all these three states is a policy, a policy to subdue the Muslims and the world in general. Everyone watched that Iran is adamant in its nuclear installations and Albaradai reported the same. But there was no assault or counter attack.if Libya had done that her installations would have blown away, if Iraq just claimed the weapons of mass destruction that could be attacked.

Afghanistan, Iraq and now Pakistan are being invaded without any solid reason. The news is there that America has started mission against terrorism in Yemen without declaration. Overtly the two powers Usa and Israel are deadly against the very existence of Iran but it is not the factual position. The history clearly reveals that the super powers of the world and the super power of the super power are in perfect harmony with Iran. No doubt they comprise its name in the rogue states list or nasty triangle with North Korea and Iraq, but do nothing that is undoubtedly against the interests of Iran.

They threat Iran of bad consequences but no body in the world can cite even a particular incident that is against the basal interest of Iran. There are economic sanctions against Iran but only by the Usa. All the European countries even the closest ally England does usual company with Iran. World is hearing since long that Israel and America are going to assault Iran but this always looks true only in the media. All the threats and ostensible dangers of war against Iran are nothing more than the war of the words. Americans call Iran the enemy state along with Israel and Iran reply in the same coins.

The Us and Israeli officials leave the horses of straw to defeat the paper tigers of Iran. It is quite clear that all this bickering is only strategic. They have no intention to besiege Iran practically. The American and Israeli lobbies are using the Iran card to intimidate the world and especially the neighbors of Iran.These neighbors comprise the Arab states including Palestine and Saudi Arabia. They make Iran cat's paw to enhance their policy and interests. They intimidate Iran but target of these threats are some other states, which are to be constantly reminded that they should not cross the limits. A threat to Iran works as a panacea to all the target states and they hide their heads as turtles and creep to their ponds. It is quite true that the threats are mere threats and a tool to improve the strategic interests.

On the contrary Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan are eternally hit by the real sanctions in correct terms. America compelled the whole world to ostracize Iraq and Afghanistan from the comity of the nations. Pakistan is being presented as a real threat to world's peace and is being besieged by the international brain agencies.

Iran and the West

Friends Link : todays world news headlines

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Afghanistan's Trillion Dollar Mineral Deposits and Bolivia's Mining Infrastructure Dilemma

Perhaps you have heard that in Afghanistan they have found between one and trillion worth of mineral deposits. And when you look at the list of exotic metals, power resources, and important minerals it's almost as if Afghanistan, a landlocked country in the middle of nowhere, is sitting on a gold mine of raw materials. Of policy there is a challenge to all this; Afghanistan still doesn't have sufficient roads and highways. And it no ifs ands or buts doesn't have major roads between some of the largest mineral deposits.

Yes, it could take almost a decade to build the roads principal to move these minerals and raw materials to market, and to put forth the infrastructure to dig that matter the ground. Nevertheless, they are they are, and this is good news for Nato and Us forces, because it shows that Afghanistan no ifs ands or buts does have a future, albeit out a concentrate decades from now. Of course, because China is in desperate need of raw materials, and since it is only one major mountain region away, possibly things are not as bad as they look.

News From Afghanistan

The world is quite good at building roads, and we obviously have the market tool needed, and the quality to build more to control these mines on a huge scale. If push came to shove, this could be done rather quickly, of policy we need stability in the nation first. Someone else captivating point is that the Taliban, and many Afghanistan farmers are busy growing poppies to make drugs, and those drugs are destabilizing many countries and societies. The opium trade is alive and well throughout the world.

Of policy you just can't turn it off right away or many of the farmers and all their workers will starve, because there are not a lot of other resources, jobs, or things to do in that vast country, without a carport civilization behind things like; water, education, transportation, distribution, energy, security, and economy. Still, finding one to trillion worth of mineral deposit is by all means; of course a plus.

Now, let me collate this to Someone else landlocked country in the middle of South America; yes I speak of Bolivia which is also rich in mineral deposits, and happens to have giant salt flats containing lithium. Remember, lithium is needed for batteries for cell phones, and electric cars. Infrastructure is also needed care, but many associates are shying away because they don't trust socialist leader Evo Morales who is currently president.

As you may or may not know the Bolivian president has nationalized many mines, and that has many foreign investors somewhat sketchy on putting in large amounts of infrastructure to help them get the lithium out and into market. Both countries Afghanistan and Bolivia can be compared, as Afghanistan is trying to move up in the world, Evo Morales is driving his country downward. Both are landlocked countries, without sufficient roads and infrastructure to get all their most principal natural resources out of the country. Please reconsider all this.

Afghanistan's Trillion Dollar Mineral Deposits and Bolivia's Mining Infrastructure Dilemma

Friends Link : todays world news headlines

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Nuclear Threat From Mexico

Detonating a nuclear weapon in or over Juarez, Mexico is the same thing as detonating one in El Paso, Texas: The contrast is it may be a itsybitsy easier to effect in Juarez. From the heart of downtown El Paso to downtown Juarez is just a very short distance. Or a bomb on the international bridge dividing the two countries empties into Avenida Juárez in downtown Juarez, on the south and El Paso downtown to the north could do the job and would be easy for any terrorist to pull off. Nowhere else on the planet are two major cities of two distinct nations so intimately tied together and vulnerable - or so easy to visit from whether side day or night.

One nuclear weapon located in Juarez Mexico could kill up-wards of two million population approximately half of them Americans living in both El Paso and Juarez.

News From Afghanistan

Just a historical reminder: The atomic bomb named "Little Boy" was dropped on Hiroshima by the Enola Gay, a Boeing B-29 bomber, at 8:15 in the morning of August 6, 1945 - 62 years ago.

Of growing concern to some U.S. Officials is the way the terrorists south of the border are taking benefit of the lack of sophistication on the Mexicans part for their inability and unwillingness to safe their own borders from terrorist infiltration and are using the low Mexican immigration standards and the U.S. Open border to slip into Mexico or the U.S. With a nuclear weapon or dirty bomb.

Former Cia Director R. James Woolsey told NewsMax in an exclusive interview that terrorists could strike the American homeland - possibly with a weapon of mass destruction.
A terrorist strike with a nuclear, dirty bomb or with biological weapons was "a real possibility." Woolsey's comments echo those of Fbi Director Robert Mueller, who told NewsMax that al-Qaeda's predominant goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear expedient that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans.

Tens of millions of radical Muslims, mostly of Arabic descent, live in Latin America.
International law-enforcement authorities combating terrorism have growing concerns about a major influx into Mexico of Arabic-speaking visitors carrying Cuban, Russian, Greece, Holland and other European passports.

Many of the passport holders could not even speak the language of their so-called mum land, agreeing to a inexpressive narrative given to the Mexican legislators.
Intelligence sources have been warning us that they have noticed a tendency among Islamic terrorists to operate in Mexico. Mexico with a territory slightly bigger than Alaska and with geographic extremes that have proven excellent for hiding bombs, weapons, illegal aliens, and drugs is currently what's going on south of our border.

According to the "Inm" (Mex. Immigr.) Just last week six adult male Iraqis were arrested in Tapachula, state of Chiapas, while attempting to reach the Distrito Federal of Mexico and to march to the United States from that point. In their first declaration, the six said they entered through Central America, reached Guatemala and that there they purchased the false passports from Greece and Holland which they initially presented to Mexican officials when arrested. They also claimed they crossed the Suchiate River (bordering Mexico and Guatemala) on a raft.

The names on the phony passports were Hristov Eroslavov Dobromir, Mirian Sitkinas, Carlos Harden, Stevan Bergian, Vasileios Venetis and Vasilev Martinov Georgi.
Another two Iraqis with false Bulgarian passports were detected and detained at the airport in Monterrey, Nuevo Leon. Now, Mexican officials are reportedly investigating "a network that could be made up of Mexicans operating in Greece who is selling false Bulgarian passports for ten thousand dollars to European and Middle Eastern citizens." Last year 28 illegal's from Iraq were detected at the airport in Monterrey alone (El Porvenir said there were 23, seventeen of them in a particular event)

The most recent two, "Wisam Gorgies", 34 yr. Old male, and "Rana Nazar Peyoz", 26 yr. Old female, flew from Madrid and said they obtained the false passports in Greece; their aim was to reach the United States.

The Mexican government is very concerned with the up-tick of known Mexican communist party members who are being converted to Islam this arises from modern immigrants who import new radical jihadi philosophies into their ranks. These population are also active in Islamic missionary work converting the poor and destitute with promises of a great life under Islam.
These terrorists are organized in active cells nearby the country of Mexico agreeing to a Mexican normal who wants to remain nameless. I have seen documents describing part of the drug-smuggling cartels cooperation with terrorists using their existing routes though Mexico to the states. Islamic terrorists are paying millions to the Mexicans to converyance their drugs from Afghanistan, as well as weapons and people. These expound well defined drug routes run through a web of border crossings pointing also to the complex cooperation in the middle of various "smuggling cartels and the terrorists." These belong to jihadi organizations such as al-Qaeda, joining military with local drug lords, developing and greasing their smuggling skids with money all the way to Mexico aiming finally to hit the U.S.

With the nature of lawlessness, graft, poverty and disorder in Mexico, enables operatives of such terrorist groups as al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and Hamas to operate with impunity. These organizations have turned Mexico into a logistical strike base.
The growing danger is that the militant Islam terrorists have penetrated Mexico. Some of them have ties to smugglers operating in American states bordering Mexico, especially those with connections in Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and California.

Experienced anti-terror experts narrative the Mexican border is the Achilles heel of the group of Homeland Security.
Islam is on the move in Mexico and throughout Latin America, making dramatic gains in converting the native population, addition immigration, establishing businesses and charities and attracting concentration from U.S. Government officials who have asked their neighbors to the south to keep an eye on foreign Muslim groups.
Al-Qaeda and other allied organizations are addition operations throughout Mexico, establishing both legitimate and criminal enterprises to help fund future strike operations.
According to U.S. Ambassador to Venezuela Charles Shapiro, approximately every extremist terror group is now represented in Latin America.

Pentagon officials have confirmed human smuggling rings in Latin America are attempting to sneak al-Qaeda operatives into the U.S.
Anti-terrorism experts say extremist cells tied to Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and al-Qaeda network are operating in Argentina, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paraguay and Uruguay.
Fbi Director Robert Mueller told a congressional panel that illegal aliens from countries with ties to al-Qaeda have crossed into the U.S. From Mexico using false identities.
Mueller said some of the aliens are population with Middle Eastern names who have adopted Hispanic last names before advent into the U.S.
"We are concerned, Homeland safety is concerned about special interest aliens entering the United States," Mueller said.

The U.S. Bush administration officials have previously said al-Qaeda could try to infiltrate the United States through the Mexican border.
Al-Qaeda has come to be deeply complex in cocaine and heroine trafficking, arms and uranium smuggling, counterfeiting Cds and Dvds and money-laundering activities.
Cash laden Non-Mexicans often are more difficult to intercept because they typically pay high-end smugglers a large sum of money to efficiently help them in setting up in Mexico or help them across the border, rather than traverse it on their own.

According to the WorldNetDaily many of America's enemies have chosen Mexico as a target to search and undermine safety in the Americas and weaken America politically and strategically. America's various adversaries have chosen Mexico as their infiltration route. And American politicians are occasion the doors wide to our enemies with Nafta and The safety and Prosperity Partnership of North America (Spp) programs.

Robert Grenier, who was head of the Cia's counter-terrorism center, told a press seminar in Mexico that the Muslim terrorist organizations see the illegal immigration and drug trafficking networks in the Latin American nations as the most sufficient way to move population and equipment into the Us.
Grenier said that the Bush administration fears both Hamas and Hizballah may already have sleeper cells operating in Mexico.
Hamas and Hizballah have both threatened in the past to enlarge their war against Israel to contain the United States.

Source: U.S. Government, Mexican Government, Laguna Journal, WorldNetDaily & NewsMax.

Nuclear Threat From Mexico

Friends Link : todays world news headlines

Friday, February 11, 2011

Afghanistan: hereafter After Nato resignation

Afghanistan has a long history. This history is full of wars and conflicts. From 1978 this country is in the state of war. This long and continuous conflict has left the country in very poor condition. After 9/11 Usa came to Afghanistan and ousted Taliban regime. At that point some belief that it might prove the point where bloody conflict end and new good hereafter start. Many hoped and wished so but reality is quite different.

Currently Afghanistan is controlled by Nato soldiery in some parts, Afghan Army and Police in some other parts, while remaining country is controlled by warlords and Taliban. Us President Obama came to Washington with turn as his agenda. This turn schedule has resulted in pull out of Us and Nato soldiery within 2 to 3 years. Some measure will be remaining for helping Afghan government.

News From Afghanistan

Future of Afghanistan, after foreign soldiery pull out seems uncertain. Current Afghan government is least favorite and their substitutes are enjoying nearly same popularity. This is a perilous situation as once pull out starts then forces, which are dormant now, will start acting. They are waiting for foreign force to leave and once it is done they will start to make grounds for themselves.

Washington has expressed pleasure on the Afghan situation and hoped that till pull out time situation will added improve. This seems more a wishful thinking than reality. If Taliban and Al Qaeda are passive it is not because of their weakness but rather due to their strategy. They are clear that after pull out current Afghan regime is incapable and inapt to resist Taliban. They are eying Kabul after pull out and this is more realistic than Washington appraisal that things will improve.

Current Afghan regime is nothing else but a pure, undiluted disappointment for Afghan people. The brave Afghan are ruled by the most inefficient group of people. It is authentically tragic that President Obama despite his ultimate disappointment had no other selection but current Afghan president. Mr. Karzai is notorious for his corruption and weak control.

It is high time for Washington to reassess its hereafter prediction about Afghanistan. It should think all ground realities before development any judgment. Any wrong appraisal will have great repercussions for the region in singular and the world in general.

Afghanistan: hereafter After Nato resignation

 
 

Followers

Blogger