Posts
The War in Afghanistan is spicy to say the least, and something that is most uncomfortable to the American population is a looming question; "Why are we there?" If we are there to attack the Taliban, then why? Did they attack the New York Trade Towers or was it Al Qaeda, and if it was both, as in the Taliban training camps trains enemies against the Usa, and Al Qaeda carried out the attacks and we want to wipe them out, then we need to go after them with vengeance.
Are we doing that?
News From Afghanistan
If so, what's taking so long? And if we can't because they are hiding in Pakistan where we can't go get them, then we lose, or we allow the drones to pick them off one evil doer at a time?
Now it seems we are re-building Afghanistan, but why? We didn't destroy it, that country was bombed back to the stone age by the Russians before us and there has been inter-country violence forever and a day there in that region, all the way back some 3500 years, that we know about, truly longer.
Thus, if our young president decides to add the 30,000 further troops, he needs to remind the American population once again why we are there, and the message must be believable. If he decides not to he must justify why he is going against the mission he set out to continue and against the guidance of his soldiery commanders there. Remember this is costing a whole lot of much needed cash.
Many political analysts would call this a catch-22, as would I, and some would say it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. Oh, my, see how politics can get? A president's dilemma indeed, damned if you do, damned if you don't and whatever is done like it or not the polls won't. If the Us leaves, the Taliban and Al Qaeda will claim victory regardless of the reality, and all the human proprietary challenges that exist will continue, along with the drug crops. Please think all this.
A President's Dilemma legitimately - Send More military - Yes Or NoVisit : todays world news headlines
0 comments:
Post a Comment